Wikipedia i gender: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Literatura przedmiotu
Skocz do: nawigacja, szukaj
Linia 1: Linia 1:
 
==Literatura==
 
==Literatura==
 +
# Ford, Heather and Wajcman, Judy (2017) ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap, "Social Studies of Science", 47 (4). pp. 511-527.
 +
#* "Wikipedia􀇯s tools and material infrastructure, but most importantly its logics originate from both the free software and Western scientific epistemologies and processes. This has two key implications for gender equity on the platform. First, Wikipedia􀇯s identity as an encyclopedia for facts is still governed by historically conservative (male) scientific understandings of expertise and authority. Second, viewed as an infrastructure, Wikipedia requires highly technical expertise, expertise that is traditionally gendered."<ref>s. 516</ref>
 +
# Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation, PLoS ONE. Jun2013, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p1-5. 5p.
 +
# Paul Hyman, Gender Bias at Wikipedia?, Communications of the ACM. Oct2011, Vol. 54 Issue 10, p18-18. 1/3p.
 +
# Klein, Maximilian, and Piotr Konieczny. 2015. “Gender Gap through Time and Space: A Journey through Wikipedia Biographies and the ‘wigi’ Index.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03086.
 +
#* they find female representation in the online encyclopedia between 12 percent and 27 percent across human history, depending on culture and language, and actually propose to use their measure as a country-level index of gender inequality similar and complementary to measures such as the gender empowerment index. They also show that female biographies are growing exponentially on Wikipedia, with an estimated year of gender parity in 2034, although they caution that most likely the observed growth will slow down
 +
# Sook Lim, Nahyun Kwon, Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Jul2010, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p212-220. 9p.
 +
# Joseph M. Reagle, Lauren Rhue, Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica, "International Journal of Communication" 5 : 2011. [https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631]
 +
#* "We conclude that Wikipedia provides better coverage and longer articles, and that it typically has more articles on women than Britannica in absolute terms, but we also find that Wikipedia articles on women are more likely to be missing than are articles on men relative to Britannica."
 +
# Wagner, Claudia, Eduardo Graells-Garrido, David Garcia, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. “Women through the Glass Ceiling: Gender Asymmetries in Wikipedia.” EPJ Data Science Journal 5(5).
 +
#* Wikipedia has a glass ceiling for women
 +
#* women’s biographies focus more on personal and familial aspects and less on their contributions to the public sphere. In addition, the authors find linguistic bias and structural gender differences in how articles about women are linked to others.
 +
#* Wikipedia’s women are on average more notable than its men and interpret this to mean that editors impose a higher notability threshold on women than men.
 +
 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia
 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia
 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_inequality#In_television_and_film
 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_inequality#In_television_and_film

Wersja z 14:30, 30 maj 2020

Literatura

  1. Ford, Heather and Wajcman, Judy (2017) ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap, "Social Studies of Science", 47 (4). pp. 511-527.
    • "Wikipedia􀇯s tools and material infrastructure, but most importantly its logics originate from both the free software and Western scientific epistemologies and processes. This has two key implications for gender equity on the platform. First, Wikipedia􀇯s identity as an encyclopedia for facts is still governed by historically conservative (male) scientific understandings of expertise and authority. Second, viewed as an infrastructure, Wikipedia requires highly technical expertise, expertise that is traditionally gendered."[1]
  2. Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation, PLoS ONE. Jun2013, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p1-5. 5p.
  3. Paul Hyman, Gender Bias at Wikipedia?, Communications of the ACM. Oct2011, Vol. 54 Issue 10, p18-18. 1/3p.
  4. Klein, Maximilian, and Piotr Konieczny. 2015. “Gender Gap through Time and Space: A Journey through Wikipedia Biographies and the ‘wigi’ Index.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03086.
    • they find female representation in the online encyclopedia between 12 percent and 27 percent across human history, depending on culture and language, and actually propose to use their measure as a country-level index of gender inequality similar and complementary to measures such as the gender empowerment index. They also show that female biographies are growing exponentially on Wikipedia, with an estimated year of gender parity in 2034, although they caution that most likely the observed growth will slow down
  5. Sook Lim, Nahyun Kwon, Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Jul2010, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p212-220. 9p.
  6. Joseph M. Reagle, Lauren Rhue, Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica, "International Journal of Communication" 5 : 2011. [1]
    • "We conclude that Wikipedia provides better coverage and longer articles, and that it typically has more articles on women than Britannica in absolute terms, but we also find that Wikipedia articles on women are more likely to be missing than are articles on men relative to Britannica."
  7. Wagner, Claudia, Eduardo Graells-Garrido, David Garcia, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. “Women through the Glass Ceiling: Gender Asymmetries in Wikipedia.” EPJ Data Science Journal 5(5).
    • Wikipedia has a glass ceiling for women
    • women’s biographies focus more on personal and familial aspects and less on their contributions to the public sphere. In addition, the authors find linguistic bias and structural gender differences in how articles about women are linked to others.
    • Wikipedia’s women are on average more notable than its men and interpret this to mean that editors impose a higher notability threshold on women than men.


Pojęcia, narzędzia, teorie

Przykłady

  • ↑ s. 516
    • Źródło: „http://emet.hekko24.pl/lp/index.php?title=Wikipedia_i_gender&oldid=2107”