Wikipedia: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Literatura przedmiotu
Skocz do: nawigacja, szukaj
(→‎Wiarygodność)
(→‎Książki)
(Nie pokazano 40 pośrednich wersji utworzonych przez tego samego użytkownika)
Linia 1: Linia 1:
−
==Wiarygodność Wikipedii==
 
−
[[Wiarygodność Wikipedii]]
 
−
 
−
==Stronniczość (bias)==
 
−
Zob. [[Stronniczość Wikipedii]]
 
−
 
−
 
  
 
# motywacja: grywalizacja - homo ludens
 
# motywacja: grywalizacja - homo ludens
 
# Wiki-Wiki - imię tytułowej postaci opowiadania napisanego przez Martina Edena
 
# Wiki-Wiki - imię tytułowej postaci opowiadania napisanego przez Martina Edena
 +
# Wikpedia cytowana przez wykładowcę MIT: http://video.mit.edu/watch/thomas-youngs-double-slit-experiment-8432/
 +
# Wikipedisten gegen Wikipedianer. https://www.hist.net/archives/4359
  
−
==Bibliografie==
+
==Dziedziny wikipedystyki==
−
* Portal badawczy https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Index
+
* [[Wiarygodność Wikipedii]]
−
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Resources (bibliografia źródeł naukowych i narzędzi)
+
* [[Stronniczość Wikipedii]] (bias)
−
* http://wikilit.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wikipedii)
+
* [[Autorstwo Wikipedii]]
−
* http://wikipapers.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wiki w ogólności)
+
−
* https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_w_publikacjach_naukowych
+
  
 +
==Jak dodano wiki==
 +
* [Nupedia-l] Let's make a wiki https://web.archive.org/web/20030414014355/http://www.nupedia.com/pipermail/nupedia-l/2001-January/000676.html
  
 
==Dane badawcze==
 
==Dane badawcze==
−
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Data
+
# https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Data
  
−
== Badania Wikipedii ==
+
==Bibliografie==
−
* Praca licencjacka, 2004: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Piotr_Spigiel_-_Praca_licencjacka
+
# Portal badawczy https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Index
−
=== Problem reklam ===
+
# https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Resources (bibliografia źródeł naukowych i narzędzi)
−
* Marvin Oppong, Versteckte Werbung bei Wikipedia, "Deutsche Welle", http://www.dw.com/de/versteckte-werbung-bei-wikipedia/a-17389658 [[File:Werbung wikipedia.png|50px]]
+
# http://wikilit.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wikipedii)
 +
# http://wikipapers.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wiki w ogólności)
 +
# https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_w_publikacjach_naukowych
  
−
=== Historia idei wiki===
+
==Bibliografia ogólna==
−
* Ðorde Stakic Wiki technology - origin, development and importance Infotheca, No. 1-2, Vol. X, June 2009. 2009 [397] Origin, development and importance of Wikipedia, Wiki software (MediaWiki) and Wiki technology.
+
===Książki===
−
 
+
−
[hide]
+
−
Objective: Late 20th century and early 21st century are marked by the emergence and expansion of Wiki technology in the field of informational technologies. The largest ever compiled encyclopedia, Wikipedia, emerged from Wiki technology. Compilation of Wikipedia as the most successful project based on Wiki technology showed true potential of Wiki software. This software is now widely used and imposes itself as a new standard. In addition to Wikipedia, local Wiki Web sites are important as well.
+
−
 
+
−
* Sanja Perovic, The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopéédie. Paragraph. Mar2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p12-29. 18p.
+
−
 
+
−
For some time now, certain theorists have been urging us to move beyond text-based understandings of culture to consider the impact of new media on the structure and organization of knowledge. This article, however, reconsiders the usual priority given to digital media by comparing Wikipedia, the free, user-led online Encyclopedia, with Diderot and D'Alembert's eighteenth-century Encyclopéédie. It begins by suggesting that the dichotomy between information system and text is not sufficient for describing the differences between the two. It then considers more closely the type of critical thinking presupposed by the Encyclopéédie. It concludes by raising the question of the role of judgement in making sense of any encyclopedia in a modern world in which knowledge systems only coexist on the condition of being partially blind to one another. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
+
−
 
+
−
=== Studia nad Zagładą ===  
+
−
 
+
−
* Bar-Ilan, Judit Web links and search engine ranking: The case of Google and the query "jew" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Volume 57 2006 [278]
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
The World Wide Web has become one of our more important information sources, and commercial search engines are the major tools for locating information; however, it is not enough for a Web page to be indexed by the search engines-it also must rank high on relevant queries. One of the parameters involved in ranking is the number and quality of links pointing to the page, based on the assumption that links convey appreciation for a page. This article presents the results of a content analysis of the links to two top pages retrieved by Google for the query jew" as of July 2004: the "jew" entry on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia and the home page of {"Jew} Watch a highly {anti-Semitic} site. The top results for the query jew" gained public attention in April 2004 when it was noticed that the {"Jew} Watch" homepage ranked number 1. From this point on both sides engaged in {"Googlebombing"} (i.e. increasing the number of links pointing to these pages). The results of the study show that most of the links to these pages come from blogs and discussion links and the number of links pointing to these pages in appreciation of their content is extremely small. These findings have implications for ranking algorithms based on link counts and emphasize the huge difference between Web links and citations in the scientific community."
+
−
 
+
−
=== Badania literackie ===
+
−
* https://pbn.nauka.gov.pl/works/428748
+
−
=== Problem autorstwa ===
+
−
* http://wikipapers.referata.com/wiki/Authorship
+
−
* Ofer Arazy, Eleni Stroulia, A utility for estimating the relative contributions of wiki authors, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’09) : . 2009 May 2009. San Jose, California, USA.
+
−
* Marcin Sydow, Jacek Szejda, Dominika Czerniawska, Does a “Renaissance Man” Create Good Wikipedia Articles?, w: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, red. A. Fred, J. Filipe, Rzym 2014.
+
−
* Katarzyna Baraniak, Marcin Sydow, Jacek Szejda, Dominika Czerniawska. Studying the Role of Diversity in Open Collaboration Network: Experiments on Wikipedia, w: Advances in Network Science, Proceedings, red. A. Wierzbicki, U. Brandes, F. Schweitzer, D. Pedraschi, Wrocław 2016.
+
−
* Nora Miller, Wikipedia and the Disappearing "Author", "ETC: A Review of General Semantics" Jan 2005, Vol. 62 Issue 1.
+
−
* Stephen T. Jordan, The Problem of the Aggregate Author, "International Journal of the Book" 2007, Vol. 4, Issue 4.
+
−
* Florian Hartling, The Digital Author? Authorship in the Digital Era, w: The Author: Who or What is Writing Literature? red. Vanesa Matajc, Gašper Troha, Ljubjana 2009.
+
−
* Margaret Chon, The Romantic Collective Author, "Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law" Summer2012, Vol. 14 Issue 4.
+
−
* A. Swartz. (2006, Sep.) Who writes wikipedia. [Online]. Available: http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia (Aaron Swartz w krytyce tezy Jimmy Walesa: większa część treści jest wytworzona przez użytkowników okazjonalnych)
+
−
* http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Power_of_the_few_vs._Wisdom_of_the_crowd:_Wikipedia_and_the_rise_of_the_bourgeoisie
+
−
* Felipe Ortega, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona, Gregorio Robles, On the Inequality of Contributions to Wikipedia, w: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC 2008.
+
−
* Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong (Tony) K. Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, John Riedl, Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia, "GROUP '07 Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work" New York 2007. [http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~reid/papers/group282-priedhorsky.pdf]
+
−
* Fabian Flöck, Maribel Acosta, WikiWho: Precise and Efficient Attribution of Authorship of Revisioned Content, w: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, Nowy Jork 2014. [http://www.aifb.kit.edu/images/1/1f/Www2014_submission_715_(9).pdf]
+
−
* Fabian Flöck, Andriy Rodchenko, Whose article is it anyway? – Detecting authorship distribution in Wikipedia articles over time with WIKIGIN, "Online proceedings of the Wikipedia Academy" 2012/7.
+
−
* Fabian Flöck, Kenan Erdogan, Maribel Acosta, TokTrack: A Complete Token Provenance and Change Tracking Dataset for the English Wikipedia,
+
−
Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2017), Montréal 2017.
+
−
 
+
−
=== Krytyka dyskursu ===
+
−
* Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse The Information Society, Volume 25, Number 1, January 2009 , pp. 38-59 2009
+
−
 
+
−
Information systems researchers that apply critical social perspectives frequently emphasize the potential for information technology to serve as a mechanism for increased rationalization, domination, and control. Such theorists often overlook or discount the liberating aspects of information systems. In this study, we apply the ideal of rational discourse developed by Jurgen Habermas to the phenomenon of Wikipedia in an effort to explore empirically the emancipatory potential of information systems. We contend that Wikipedia embodies an approximation of the necessary conditions for rational discourse. While several challenges persist, the example of Wikipedia illustrates the positive potential of information systems in supporting the emergence of more emancipatory forms of communication. The corresponding implications for researchers and design professionals alike are discussed.
+
−
 
+
−
=== Badania kulturowe ===
+
−
 
+
−
* Sebastian Skolik, Wikipedia jako scena walki politycznej. Strategie politycznych ataków oraz obrony przed upolitycznieniem projektu, w: Media a komunikowanie polityczne, red. M. Sokołowski, Toruń 2009.
+
−
 
+
−
* Dariusz Jemielniak, Życie wirtualnych dzikich Netnografia Wikipedii, największego projektu współtworzonego przez ludzi, Warszawa 2013.
+
−
 
+
−
* Pfeil, Ulrike, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Chee Siang Ang Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), article 5 2006 [361]
+
−
[hide]
+
−
This article explores the relationship between national culture and computer-mediated communication (CMC) in Wikipedia. The articles on the topic game from the French, German, Japanese, and Dutch Wikipedia websites were studied using content analysis methods. Correlations were investigated between patterns of contributions and the four dimensions of cultural influences proposed by Hofstede (Power Distance, Collectivism versus Individualism, Femininity versus Masculinity, and Uncertainty Avoidance). The analysis revealed cultural differences in the style of contributions across the cultures investigated, some of which are correlated with the dimensions identified by Hofstede. These findings suggest that cultural differences that are observed in the physical world also exist in the virtual world.
+
−
 
+
−
* Ewa S. Callahan, Susan C. Herring, Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Oct2011, Vol. 62 Issue 10, p1899-1915. 17p. 6 Charts, 12 Graphs.
+
−
 
+
−
Abstrakt:
+
−
Wikipedia advocates a strict 'neutral point of view' (NPOV) policy. However, although originally a U.S-based, English-language phenomenon, the online, user-created encyclopedia now has versions in many languages. This study examines the extent to which content and perspectives vary across cultures by comparing articles about famous persons in the Polish and English editions of Wikipedia. The results of quantitative and qualitative content analyses reveal systematic differences related to the different cultures, histories, and values of Poland and the United States; at the same time, a U.S./English-language advantage is evident throughout. In conclusion, the implications of these findings for the quality and objectivity of Wikipedia as a global repository of knowledge are discussed, and recommendations are advanced for Wikipedia end users and content developers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
* Alexander Mehler, Olga Pustylnikov, Nils Diewald, Geography of social ontologies: Testing a variant of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in the context of Wikipedia, Computer Speech & Language. Jul2011, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p716-740. 25p.
+
−
 
+
−
Abstrakt:
+
−
Abstract: In this article, we test a variant of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in the area of complex network theory. This is done by analyzing social ontologies as a new resource for automatic language classification. Our method is to solely explore structural features of social ontologies in order to predict family resemblances of languages used by the corresponding communities to build these ontologies. This approach is based on a reformulation of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in terms of distributed cognition. Starting from a corpus of 160 Wikipedia-based social ontologies, we test our variant of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis by several experiments, and find out that we outperform the corresponding baselines. All in all, the article develops an approach to classify linguistic networks of tens of thousands of vertices by exploring a small range of mathematically well-established topological indices. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
+
−
 
+
−
===Badania międzykulturowe===
+
−
* Besiki Stvilia, Abdullah Al-Faraj, Yong Jeong Yi, Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation—The case of Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Dec2009, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p232-239. 8p.
+
−
 
+
−
Abstrakt:
+
−
An initial exploration into the issue of information quality evaluation across different cultural and community contexts based on data collected from the Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias showed that different Wikipedia communities may have different understandings of and models for quality. It also showed the feasibility of using some article edit-based metrics for automated quality measurement across different Wikipedia contexts. A model for measuring context similarity was developed and used to evaluate the relationship between similarities in sociocultural factors and the understanding of information quality by the three Wikipedia communities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
+
−
 
+
−
=== Lingwistyka ===
+
−
* Ildikó Kasza, György Várady, Hajnalka Andrikovics, Magdalena Koszarska, Attila Tordai, George L. Scheffer, Adrienn Németh, Gergely Szakács, Balázs Sarkadi, A Practical Approach to Language Complexity: A Wikipedia Case Study, PLoS ONE. Nov2012, Vol. 7 Issue 11, Special section p1-8. 8p.
+
−
 
+
−
Abstrakt:
+
−
In this paper we present statistical analysis of English texts from Wikipedia. We try to address the issue of language complexity empirically by comparing the simple English Wikipedia (Simple) to comparable samples of the main English Wikipedia (Main). Simple is supposed to use a more simplified language with a limited vocabulary, and editors are explicitly requested to follow this guideline, yet in practice the vocabulary richness of both samples are at the same level. Detailed analysis of longer units (n-grams of words and part of speech tags) shows that the language of Simple is less complex than that of Main primarily due to the use of shorter sentences, as opposed to drastically simplified syntax or vocabulary. Comparing the two language varieties by the Gunning readability index supports this conclusion. We also report on the topical dependence of language complexity, that is, that the language is more advanced in conceptual articles compared to person-based (biographical) and object-based articles. Finally, we investigate the relation between conflict and language complexity by analyzing the content of the talk pages associated to controversial and peacefully developing articles, concluding that controversy has the effect of reducing language complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
* Marcin Milkowski Automated Building of Error Corpora of Polish Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications – State of the Art. PALC 2007, Peter Lang. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften 2008, 631-639 2008 [488]
+
−
[hide]
+
−
 
+
−
The paper shows how to automatically develop error corpora out of revision history of documents. The idea is based on a hypothesis that minor edits in documents represent correction of typos, slips of the tongue, grammar, usage and style mistakes. This hypothesis has been confirmed by frequency analysis of revision history of articles in the Polish Wikipedia. Resources such as revision history in Wikipedia, Wikia, and other collaborative editing systems, can be turned into corpora of errors, just by extracting the minor edits. The most theoretically interesting aspect is that the corrections will represent the average speaker's intuitions about usage, and this seems to be a promising way of researching normativity in claims about proper or improper Polish. By processing the revision history, one can gain pairs of segments in the corpus: first representing the error, and the other representing the correction. Moreover, it is relatively easy to tag parts of speech, compare subsequent versions, and prepare a text file containing the resulting corpus.
+
−
 
+
−
=== Metodologia nauki ===
+
−
KRZYSZTOF SUCHECKI, ALKIM ALMILA AKDAG SALAH, EVOLUTION OF WIKIPEDIA'S CATEGORY STRUCTURE, Advances in Complex Systems. Jun2012 Supplement, Vol. 15, p1250068-1-1250068-21. 21p. 3
+
−
Abstrakt:
+
−
Wikipedia, as a social phenomenon of collaborative knowledge creation, has been studied extensively from various points of view. The category system of Wikipedia, introduced in 2004, has attracted relatively little attention. In this study, we focus on the documentation of knowledge, and the transformation of this documentation with time. We take Wikipedia as a sample of knowledge in general and its category system as an aspect of the structure of this knowledge. We investigate the evolution of the category structure of the English Wikipedia from its birth in 2004 to 2008. We treat the category system as if it is a hierarchical Knowledge Organization System, capturing the changes in the distributions of the top categories. We investigate how the clustering of articles, defined by the category system, matches the direct link network between the articles and show how it changes over time. We find the Wikipedia category network mostly stable, but with occasional reorganization. We show that the clustering matches the link structure quite well, except short periods preceding the reorganizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
+
−
 
+
−
=== Edukacja ===
+
−
 
+
−
* Tomás Saorín Pérez, Maria Veronica De Haro y De San Mateo, Juan Antonio Pastor Sánchez, Posibilidades de Wikipedia en la docencia universitaria: elaboración colaborativa de conocimiento, Ibersid. 2011, Vol. 5, p89-97. 9p.
+
−
 
+
−
Abstrakt (język angielski):
+
−
 
+
−
A guide for Wikipedia student edition as a collaborative active learning activity is presented. Whereas the use of wikis in the classroom is widely documented, the educational possibilities of Wikipedia itself are not so much. We offer a classification of participatory activities suitable for being carried out by the students in the development of the curricular contents. One of the most relevant aspects is the transformation of the critical and distrustful speech towards the Wikipedia in a direct knowledge of its scope, process of production and systems of quality control. In addition, it is a good opportunity to improve a widespread source of information among university undergraduates that has a real impact and for the students to develop a more critical and active use of information sources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
+
−
 
+
−
=== Studia gender ===
+
−
 
+
−
* Paul Hyman, Gender Bias at Wikipedia?, Communications of the ACM. Oct2011, Vol. 54 Issue 10, p18-18. 1/3p.
+
−
* Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation, PLoS ONE. Jun2013, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p1-5. 5p.
+
−
* Sook Lim, Nahyun Kwon, Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Jul2010, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p212-220. 9p.
+
−
 
+
−
=== Socjologia ===
+
−
* The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration Community: How Wikipedia's reaction to sudden popularity is causing its decline https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfaker/publications/The_Rise_and_Decline/
+
−
* Michał Danielewicz, Wikipedia – socjologiczny reportaż z miejsca zdarzeń, "Studia Socjologiczne" (197), z. 2.
+
−
* Jeffrey Stuckman, James Purtilo, Analyzing the wikisphere: Methodology and data to support quantitative wiki research, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Aug2011, Vol. 62 Issue 8, p1564-1576. 13p.
+
−
* K. Brad Wray (2009). The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison. Episteme, 6, pp 38-51. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000531.
+
−
* Deborah Perron Tollefsen (2009). Wikipedia and the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme, 6, pp 8-24. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000518.
+
−
 
+
−
== Zastosowania w nauce ==
+
−
* Wikpedia cytowana przez wykładowcę MIT: http://video.mit.edu/watch/thomas-youngs-double-slit-experiment-8432/
+
−
* Roy Rosenzweig, Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past, Journal of American History. Jun2006, Vol. 93 Issue 1, p117-146. 30p.
+
−
* Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb, Mohamed Ben Aouicha, Abdelmajid Ben Hamadou, Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia features. Knowledge-Based Systems. Sep2013, Vol. 50, p260-278. 19p.
+
−
 
+
−
=== Zastosowania w biznesie ===
+
−
* Márton Mestyán, Taha Yasseri, János Kertész, Early Prediction of Movie Box Office Success Based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data. PLoS ONE. Aug2013, Vol. 8 Issue 8, p1-8. 8p.
+
−
 
+
−
=== W politologii ===
+
−
* Adam R. Brown (2011). Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, pp 339-343.
+
−
" I find that Wikipedia is almost always accurate when a relevant article exists, but errors of omission are extremely frequent."
+
−
 
+
−
=== W medycynie ===
+
−
* J. Sanz-Valero, Presencia y adecuación de la terminilogía sobre desórdenes nutricionales y trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en las ediciones española e inglesa de la Wikipedia. Revista de Estudios de Comunicacion. may2011, Vol. 16 Issue 30, p13-36. 24p.
+
−
 
+
−
=== W psychiatrii ===
+
−
* Reavley, N. J.; MacKinnon, A. J.; Morgan, A. J.; Alvarez-Jimenez, M.; Hetrick, S. E.; Killackey, E.; Nelson, B.; Purcell, R.; Yap, M. B. H.; Jorm, A. F.,"Quality of information sources about mental disorders: A comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources". "Psychological Medicine" 2012, vol. 42, issue 8.
+
−
("The content was rated by experts according to the following criteria: accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.(...) Across all topics, Wikipedia was the most highly rated in all domains except readability." (Abstrakt))
+
−
 
+
−
== Inne pedie ==
+
−
* http://www.gedanopedia.pl/
+
−
 
+
−
==Literatura==
+
−
# Marshall Poe, The Hive, "The Atlantic Monthly"  September 2006, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/09/the-hive/305118
+
−
# http://www.gnu.org/encyclopedia/free-encyclopedia.html
+
 
# Sébastien Blondeel, Wikipédia. Comprendre et participer, Paris 2006.
 
# Sébastien Blondeel, Wikipédia. Comprendre et participer, Paris 2006.
 
# Michel Campeanu, Mythes et vampires [Texte imprimé] : compilation-essai basé sur les références Wikipédia, Suresnes 2015.  
 
# Michel Campeanu, Mythes et vampires [Texte imprimé] : compilation-essai basé sur les références Wikipédia, Suresnes 2015.  
 
# Guy Delsaut, Utiliser Wikipédia comme source d'information fiable, Bois-Guillaume 2016.
 
# Guy Delsaut, Utiliser Wikipédia comme source d'information fiable, Bois-Guillaume 2016.
 +
# Ziko van Dijkmar, Wikis und die Wikipedia verstehen: Eine Einführung, transcript Verlag 2021.
 +
# Meike Faflik, Wikipedia und ihre Nutzer: zum Bildungswert der Online-Enzyklopädie. Marburg: Tectum-Verl, 2007.
 
# Marc Foglia et alii, Wikipédia : média de la connaissance démocratique ? : quand le citoyen lambda devient encyclopédiste, Limoges 2008.
 
# Marc Foglia et alii, Wikipédia : média de la connaissance démocratique ? : quand le citoyen lambda devient encyclopédiste, Limoges 2008.
−
# Marc Foglia, Wikipédia entre connaissqnce et démocratie, w: Martine Groult, Les Encyclopédies, Construction et circulqtion du savoir de l'antiquité à Wikipédia, Paris 2011.
+
# Fuchs, Christian: Soziale Medien und kritische Theorie. Eine Einführung, 2. vollständig überarbeitete Auflage,  
 +
München 2021,
 
# Pierre Gourdain et alii, La Révolution Wikipédia, Paris 2007.
 
# Pierre Gourdain et alii, La Révolution Wikipédia, Paris 2007.
−
# Justyna Hofmokl, Wikipedia jako internetowe dobro wspólne - studium przypadku, w: jej, Internet jako dobro wspólne, Warszawa 2008.
 
−
# Justyna Hofmokl, Alek Tarkowski, Wikipedia - pospolite ruszenie encyklopedystów. Największa encyklopedia na świecie, "EBIB" Nr 3/2006 (73), http://www.ebib.info/2006/73/hofmokl_tarkowski.php. ("wielkie laboratorium społecznego zaangażowania, które do tej pory kojarzyło się z działalnością polityczną lub społeczna")
 
 
# Dariusz Jemielniak, Życie wirtualnych dzikich. Netnografia Wikipedii, największego projektu współtworzonego przez ludzi, Warszawa 2013.
 
# Dariusz Jemielniak, Życie wirtualnych dzikich. Netnografia Wikipedii, największego projektu współtworzonego przez ludzi, Warszawa 2013.
 
# Dariusz Jemielniak, Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford: Stanford University Press 2014.  
 
# Dariusz Jemielniak, Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford: Stanford University Press 2014.  
 +
# Frédéric Kaplan, Nicolas Nova, Le miracle Wikipedia 
 
# Paul Lewinson, Nowe nowe media, przeł. M. Zawadzka, Kraków 2010.
 
# Paul Lewinson, Nowe nowe media, przeł. M. Zawadzka, Kraków 2010.
−
# http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Truth_According_to_Wikipedia
 
−
# Le miracle Wikipedia - Frédéric Kaplan, Nicolas Nova
 
−
# ANDERSEN, Ch. „Pre-Filters” vs. „Post-Filters”. In The Long Tail. A public diary on the way to a book [on-line
 
−
# Ward Cunningham, Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki, 2003, http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html.
 
 
# Andrew Lih, The Wikipedia Revolution: How A Bunch of Nobodies Created The World's Greatest Encyclopedia, 2009  
 
# Andrew Lih, The Wikipedia Revolution: How A Bunch of Nobodies Created The World's Greatest Encyclopedia, 2009  
−
# Graham Lawton, Open Source – wielka promocja rozdawania, 2003, przekład był 1. w Polsce wzmianką o Wikipedii
+
# Daniela Pscheida: Das Wikipedia-Universum. Wie das Internet unsere Wissenskultur verändert 2010
 +
# Joseph Michael Reagle Jr., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, The MIT Press 2010.
 +
# Pavel Richter, Die Wikipedia-Story: Biografie eines Weltwunders, Campus Verlag
 +
# Günter Schuler, Wikipedia inside: die Online-Enzyklopädie und ihre Community. Münster: Unrast-Verl, 2007
 
# Jörn Schulz, Wikipedia schreiben [Texte imprimé] : eine Online-Offline-Ethnografie über Wikipedianer, Saarbrücken 2017.  
 
# Jörn Schulz, Wikipedia schreiben [Texte imprimé] : eine Online-Offline-Ethnografie über Wikipedianer, Saarbrücken 2017.  
 
# Dan O'Sullivan, Wikipedia : a new community of practice?, Farnham, England 2009.
 
# Dan O'Sullivan, Wikipedia : a new community of practice?, Farnham, England 2009.
 +
# Don Tapscott, Anthony D. Williams, Wikinomics. Die Revolution im Netz, Hanser, München 2007.
 +
# Anna Tereszkiewicz, Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias: The Case of Wikipedia, 2013
 +
# Nathaniel Tkacz, Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness, Chicago 2015.
 +
# Nathaniel Tkacz, Geert Lovink (red.) Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader 2011
 +
# Wikipedia und Geschichtswissenschaft, red. Thomas Wozniak, Jürgen Nemitz, Uwe Rohwedder, Berlin 2015.
 +
 +
===Artykuły===
 +
# Andersen, Ch. „Pre-Filters” vs. „Post-Filters”. In The Long Tail. A public diary on the way to a book [on-line
 +
# Bar-Ilan, Judit, Web links and search engine ranking: The case of Google and the query "jew" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Volume 57 2006 [278]
 +
# Adam R. Brown (2011). Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, pp 339-343.
 +
#*" I find that Wikipedia is almost always accurate when a relevant article exists, but errors of omission are extremely frequent."
 +
# Ward Cunningham, Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki, 2003, http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html.
 +
# Michał Danielewicz, Wikipedia – socjologiczny reportaż z miejsca zdarzeń, "Studia Socjologiczne" (197), z. 2.
 +
# Marc Foglia, Wikipédia entre connaissqnce et démocratie, w: Martine Groult, Les Encyclopédies, Construction et circulqtion du savoir de l'antiquité à Wikipédia, Paris 2011.
 +
# Justyna Hofmokl, Wikipedia jako internetowe dobro wspólne - studium przypadku, w: jej, Internet jako dobro wspólne, Warszawa 2008.
 +
# Justyna Hofmokl, Alek Tarkowski, Wikipedia - pospolite ruszenie encyklopedystów. Największa encyklopedia na świecie, "EBIB" Nr 3/2006 (73), [http://www.ebib.info/2006/73/hofmokl_tarkowski.php]
 +
#* "wielkie laboratorium społecznego zaangażowania, które do tej pory kojarzyło się z działalnością polityczną lub społeczna"
 +
# Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse The Information Society, Volume 25, Number 1, January 2009 , pp. 38-59 2009
 +
# Ildikó Kasza, György Várady, Hajnalka Andrikovics, Magdalena Koszarska, Attila Tordai, George L. Scheffer, Adrienn Németh, Gergely Szakács, Balázs Sarkadi, A Practical Approach to Language Complexity: A Wikipedia Case Study, PLoS ONE. Nov2012, Vol. 7 Issue 11, Special section p1-8. 8p.
 +
# Alexander Mehler, Olga Pustylnikov, Nils Diewald, Geography of social ontologies: Testing a variant of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in the context of Wikipedia, Computer Speech & Language. Jul2011, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p716-740. 25p.
 +
# Marcin Milkowski, Automated Building of Error Corpora of Polish, Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications – State of the Art. PALC 2007, Peter Lang. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften 2008, 631-639 2008
 +
# Pfeil, Ulrike, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Chee Siang Ang Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), article 5 2006 [361]
 +
# Tomás Saorín Pérez, Maria Veronica De Haro y De San Mateo, Juan Antonio Pastor Sánchez, Posibilidades de Wikipedia en la docencia universitaria: elaboración colaborativa de conocimiento, Ibersid. 2011, Vol. 5, p89-97. 9p.
 +
# Sebastian Skolik, Wikipedia jako scena walki politycznej. Strategie politycznych ataków oraz obrony przed upolitycznieniem projektu, w: Media a komunikowanie polityczne, red. M. Sokołowski, Toruń 2009.
 +
# Besiki Stvilia, Abdullah Al-Faraj, Yong Jeong Yi, Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation—The case of Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Dec2009, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p232-239. 8p.
 +
# KRZYSZTOF SUCHECKI, ALKIM ALMILA AKDAG SALAH, EVOLUTION OF WIKIPEDIA'S CATEGORY STRUCTURE, Advances in Complex Systems. Jun2012 Supplement, Vol. 15, p1250068-1-1250068-21. 21p. 3
 +
# The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration Community: How Wikipedia's reaction to sudden popularity is causing its decline https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfaker/publications/The_Rise_and_Decline/
 +
# Jeffrey Stuckman, James Purtilo, Analyzing the wikisphere: Methodology and data to support quantitative wiki research, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Aug2011, Vol. 62 Issue 8, p1564-1576. 13p.
 +
# K. Brad Wray (2009). The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison. Episteme, 6, pp 38-51. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000531.
 +
#* "The people contributing do not ground their claims on their reputations as knowers. In fact, they stand to lose nothing if and when their contributions are found to be misleading or false. And the immediacy of the medium encourages gossip and jokes." (s. 47)
 +
# Deborah Perron Tollefsen (2009). Wikipedia and the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme, 6, pp 8-24. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000518.
 +
# Roy Rosenzweig, Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past, Journal of American History. Jun2006, Vol. 93 Issue 1, p117-146. 30p.
 +
# Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb, Mohamed Ben Aouicha, Abdelmajid Ben Hamadou, Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia features. Knowledge-Based Systems. Sep2013, Vol. 50, p260-278. 19p.
 +
# Márton Mestyán, Taha Yasseri, János Kertész, Early Prediction of Movie Box Office Success Based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data. PLoS ONE. Aug2013, Vol. 8 Issue 8, p1-8. 8p.
 +
# J. Sanz-Valero, Presencia y adecuación de la terminilogía sobre desórdenes nutricionales y trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en las ediciones española e inglesa de la Wikipedia. Revista de Estudios de Comunicacion. may2011, Vol. 16 Issue 30, p13-36. 24p.
 +
# Ðorde Stakic Wiki technology - origin, development and importance Infotheca, No. 1-2, Vol. X, June 2009. 2009 [397] Origin, development and importance of Wikipedia, Wiki software (MediaWiki) and Wiki technology.
 +
# Reavley, N. J.; MacKinnon, A. J.; Morgan, A. J.; Alvarez-Jimenez, M.; Hetrick, S. E.; Killackey, E.; Nelson, B.; Purcell, R.; Yap, M. B. H.; Jorm, A. F.,"Quality of information sources about mental disorders: A comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources". "Psychological Medicine" 2012, vol. 42, issue 8.
 +
#* "The content was rated by experts according to the following criteria: accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.(...) Across all topics, Wikipedia was the most highly rated in all domains except readability."
 +
# Marshall Poe, The Hive, "The Atlantic Monthly"  September 2006, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/09/the-hive/305118
 +
# http://www.gnu.org/encyclopedia/free-encyclopedia.html
 +
# Graham Lawton, Open Source – wielka promocja rozdawania, 2003, przekład był 1. w Polsce wzmianką o Wikipedii
 
# [https://books.openedition.org/pupo/4089 Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié]
 
# [https://books.openedition.org/pupo/4089 Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié]
−
# Wikipedia und Geschichtswissenschaft, red. Thomas Wozniak, Jürgen Nemitz, Uwe Rohwedder, Berlin 2015.
+
# Halfaker, Geiger, Morgan, Riedl 2009;  
−
# Halfaker, Geiger, Morgan, Riedl 2009; Lih, 2009; O'Sullivan 2009;  
+
# Lih, 2009;  
 +
# O'Sullivan 2009;  
 
# Niederer and Dijck, 2011;  
 
# Niederer and Dijck, 2011;  
 
# Yasseri, Sumi, Rung, Kornai & Kertesz, 2012;  
 
# Yasseri, Sumi, Rung, Kornai & Kertesz, 2012;  
−
# Nathaniel Tkacz, Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness, Chicago 2015.
 
−
# Nathaniel Tkacz, Geert Lovink (red.) Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader 2011
 
 
# Thompson, 2016
 
# Thompson, 2016
 +
# Pentzold C and Seidenglanz S (2006) Foucault@ Wiki: first steps towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of Wiki discourses. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis, 59-68.
 +
# Niederer S and van Dijck J (2010) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society 12(8): 1368􀈂1387.
 +
# Marvin Oppong, Versteckte Werbung bei Wikipedia, "Deutsche Welle", http://www.dw.com/de/versteckte-werbung-bei-wikipedia/a-17389658 [File:Werbung wikipedia.png] (Problem reklam )
 +
# Sanja Perovic, The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopéédie. Paragraph. Mar2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p12-29. 18p.
 +
# Piotr Spigiel, Wikipedia – wolna encyklopedia Motywacja do uczestnictwa w projekcie, Wikipedia jako grupa społeczna, Wrocław 2004 [https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Piotr_Spigiel_-_Praca_licencjacka]
 +
 +
== Inne pedie ==
 +
# http://www.gedanopedia.pl/
 +
 +
==Filmy==
 +
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Truth_According_to_Wikipedia The Truth According to Wikipedia, 2008]
 +
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_in_Numbers%3F Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia 2010]

Wersja z 15:21, 6 gru 2021

  1. motywacja: grywalizacja - homo ludens
  2. Wiki-Wiki - imię tytułowej postaci opowiadania napisanego przez Martina Edena
  3. Wikpedia cytowana przez wykładowcę MIT: http://video.mit.edu/watch/thomas-youngs-double-slit-experiment-8432/
  4. Wikipedisten gegen Wikipedianer. https://www.hist.net/archives/4359

Dziedziny wikipedystyki

Jak dodano wiki

Dane badawcze

  1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Data

Bibliografie

  1. Portal badawczy https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Index
  2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Resources (bibliografia źródeł naukowych i narzędzi)
  3. http://wikilit.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wikipedii)
  4. http://wikipapers.referata.com/ (prace naukowe nt. wiki w ogólności)
  5. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_w_publikacjach_naukowych

Bibliografia ogólna

Książki

  1. Sébastien Blondeel, Wikipédia. Comprendre et participer, Paris 2006.
  2. Michel Campeanu, Mythes et vampires [Texte imprimé] : compilation-essai basé sur les références Wikipédia, Suresnes 2015.
  3. Guy Delsaut, Utiliser Wikipédia comme source d'information fiable, Bois-Guillaume 2016.
  4. Ziko van Dijkmar, Wikis und die Wikipedia verstehen: Eine Einführung, transcript Verlag 2021.
  5. Meike Faflik, Wikipedia und ihre Nutzer: zum Bildungswert der Online-Enzyklopädie. Marburg: Tectum-Verl, 2007.
  6. Marc Foglia et alii, Wikipédia : média de la connaissance démocratique ? : quand le citoyen lambda devient encyclopédiste, Limoges 2008.
  7. Fuchs, Christian: Soziale Medien und kritische Theorie. Eine Einführung, 2. vollständig überarbeitete Auflage,

München 2021,

  1. Pierre Gourdain et alii, La Révolution Wikipédia, Paris 2007.
  2. Dariusz Jemielniak, Życie wirtualnych dzikich. Netnografia Wikipedii, największego projektu współtworzonego przez ludzi, Warszawa 2013.
  3. Dariusz Jemielniak, Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford: Stanford University Press 2014.
  4. Frédéric Kaplan, Nicolas Nova, Le miracle Wikipedia
  5. Paul Lewinson, Nowe nowe media, przeł. M. Zawadzka, Kraków 2010.
  6. Andrew Lih, The Wikipedia Revolution: How A Bunch of Nobodies Created The World's Greatest Encyclopedia, 2009
  7. Daniela Pscheida: Das Wikipedia-Universum. Wie das Internet unsere Wissenskultur verändert 2010
  8. Joseph Michael Reagle Jr., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, The MIT Press 2010.
  9. Pavel Richter, Die Wikipedia-Story: Biografie eines Weltwunders, Campus Verlag
  10. Günter Schuler, Wikipedia inside: die Online-Enzyklopädie und ihre Community. Münster: Unrast-Verl, 2007
  11. Jörn Schulz, Wikipedia schreiben [Texte imprimé] : eine Online-Offline-Ethnografie über Wikipedianer, Saarbrücken 2017.
  12. Dan O'Sullivan, Wikipedia : a new community of practice?, Farnham, England 2009.
  13. Don Tapscott, Anthony D. Williams, Wikinomics. Die Revolution im Netz, Hanser, München 2007.
  14. Anna Tereszkiewicz, Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias: The Case of Wikipedia, 2013
  15. Nathaniel Tkacz, Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness, Chicago 2015.
  16. Nathaniel Tkacz, Geert Lovink (red.) Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader 2011
  17. Wikipedia und Geschichtswissenschaft, red. Thomas Wozniak, Jürgen Nemitz, Uwe Rohwedder, Berlin 2015.

Artykuły

  1. Andersen, Ch. „Pre-Filters” vs. „Post-Filters”. In The Long Tail. A public diary on the way to a book [on-line
  2. Bar-Ilan, Judit, Web links and search engine ranking: The case of Google and the query "jew" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Volume 57 2006 [278]
  3. Adam R. Brown (2011). Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, pp 339-343.
    • " I find that Wikipedia is almost always accurate when a relevant article exists, but errors of omission are extremely frequent."
  4. Ward Cunningham, Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki, 2003, http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html.
  5. Michał Danielewicz, Wikipedia – socjologiczny reportaż z miejsca zdarzeń, "Studia Socjologiczne" (197), z. 2.
  6. Marc Foglia, Wikipédia entre connaissqnce et démocratie, w: Martine Groult, Les Encyclopédies, Construction et circulqtion du savoir de l'antiquité à Wikipédia, Paris 2011.
  7. Justyna Hofmokl, Wikipedia jako internetowe dobro wspólne - studium przypadku, w: jej, Internet jako dobro wspólne, Warszawa 2008.
  8. Justyna Hofmokl, Alek Tarkowski, Wikipedia - pospolite ruszenie encyklopedystów. Największa encyklopedia na świecie, "EBIB" Nr 3/2006 (73), [1]
    • "wielkie laboratorium społecznego zaangażowania, które do tej pory kojarzyło się z działalnością polityczną lub społeczna"
  9. Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse The Information Society, Volume 25, Number 1, January 2009 , pp. 38-59 2009
  10. Ildikó Kasza, György Várady, Hajnalka Andrikovics, Magdalena Koszarska, Attila Tordai, George L. Scheffer, Adrienn Németh, Gergely Szakács, Balázs Sarkadi, A Practical Approach to Language Complexity: A Wikipedia Case Study, PLoS ONE. Nov2012, Vol. 7 Issue 11, Special section p1-8. 8p.
  11. Alexander Mehler, Olga Pustylnikov, Nils Diewald, Geography of social ontologies: Testing a variant of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in the context of Wikipedia, Computer Speech & Language. Jul2011, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p716-740. 25p.
  12. Marcin Milkowski, Automated Building of Error Corpora of Polish, Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications – State of the Art. PALC 2007, Peter Lang. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften 2008, 631-639 2008
  13. Pfeil, Ulrike, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Chee Siang Ang Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), article 5 2006 [361]
  14. Tomás Saorín Pérez, Maria Veronica De Haro y De San Mateo, Juan Antonio Pastor Sánchez, Posibilidades de Wikipedia en la docencia universitaria: elaboración colaborativa de conocimiento, Ibersid. 2011, Vol. 5, p89-97. 9p.
  15. Sebastian Skolik, Wikipedia jako scena walki politycznej. Strategie politycznych ataków oraz obrony przed upolitycznieniem projektu, w: Media a komunikowanie polityczne, red. M. Sokołowski, Toruń 2009.
  16. Besiki Stvilia, Abdullah Al-Faraj, Yong Jeong Yi, Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation—The case of Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias, Library & Information Science Research (07408188). Dec2009, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p232-239. 8p.
  17. KRZYSZTOF SUCHECKI, ALKIM ALMILA AKDAG SALAH, EVOLUTION OF WIKIPEDIA'S CATEGORY STRUCTURE, Advances in Complex Systems. Jun2012 Supplement, Vol. 15, p1250068-1-1250068-21. 21p. 3
  18. The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration Community: How Wikipedia's reaction to sudden popularity is causing its decline https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfaker/publications/The_Rise_and_Decline/
  19. Jeffrey Stuckman, James Purtilo, Analyzing the wikisphere: Methodology and data to support quantitative wiki research, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Aug2011, Vol. 62 Issue 8, p1564-1576. 13p.
  20. K. Brad Wray (2009). The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison. Episteme, 6, pp 38-51. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000531.
    • "The people contributing do not ground their claims on their reputations as knowers. In fact, they stand to lose nothing if and when their contributions are found to be misleading or false. And the immediacy of the medium encourages gossip and jokes." (s. 47)
  21. Deborah Perron Tollefsen (2009). Wikipedia and the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme, 6, pp 8-24. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000518.
  22. Roy Rosenzweig, Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past, Journal of American History. Jun2006, Vol. 93 Issue 1, p117-146. 30p.
  23. Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb, Mohamed Ben Aouicha, Abdelmajid Ben Hamadou, Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia features. Knowledge-Based Systems. Sep2013, Vol. 50, p260-278. 19p.
  24. Márton Mestyán, Taha Yasseri, János Kertész, Early Prediction of Movie Box Office Success Based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data. PLoS ONE. Aug2013, Vol. 8 Issue 8, p1-8. 8p.
  25. J. Sanz-Valero, Presencia y adecuación de la terminilogía sobre desórdenes nutricionales y trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en las ediciones española e inglesa de la Wikipedia. Revista de Estudios de Comunicacion. may2011, Vol. 16 Issue 30, p13-36. 24p.
  26. Ðorde Stakic Wiki technology - origin, development and importance Infotheca, No. 1-2, Vol. X, June 2009. 2009 [397] Origin, development and importance of Wikipedia, Wiki software (MediaWiki) and Wiki technology.
  27. Reavley, N. J.; MacKinnon, A. J.; Morgan, A. J.; Alvarez-Jimenez, M.; Hetrick, S. E.; Killackey, E.; Nelson, B.; Purcell, R.; Yap, M. B. H.; Jorm, A. F.,"Quality of information sources about mental disorders: A comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources". "Psychological Medicine" 2012, vol. 42, issue 8.
    • "The content was rated by experts according to the following criteria: accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.(...) Across all topics, Wikipedia was the most highly rated in all domains except readability."
  28. Marshall Poe, The Hive, "The Atlantic Monthly" September 2006, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/09/the-hive/305118
  29. http://www.gnu.org/encyclopedia/free-encyclopedia.html
  30. Graham Lawton, Open Source – wielka promocja rozdawania, 2003, przekład był 1. w Polsce wzmianką o Wikipedii
  31. Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié
  32. Halfaker, Geiger, Morgan, Riedl 2009;
  33. Lih, 2009;
  34. O'Sullivan 2009;
  35. Niederer and Dijck, 2011;
  36. Yasseri, Sumi, Rung, Kornai & Kertesz, 2012;
  37. Thompson, 2016
  38. Pentzold C and Seidenglanz S (2006) Foucault@ Wiki: first steps towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of Wiki discourses. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis, 59-68.
  39. Niederer S and van Dijck J (2010) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society 12(8): 1368􀈂1387.
  40. Marvin Oppong, Versteckte Werbung bei Wikipedia, "Deutsche Welle", http://www.dw.com/de/versteckte-werbung-bei-wikipedia/a-17389658 [File:Werbung wikipedia.png] (Problem reklam )
  41. Sanja Perovic, The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopéédie. Paragraph. Mar2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p12-29. 18p.
  42. Piotr Spigiel, Wikipedia – wolna encyklopedia Motywacja do uczestnictwa w projekcie, Wikipedia jako grupa społeczna, Wrocław 2004 [2]

Inne pedie

  1. http://www.gedanopedia.pl/

Filmy

  1. The Truth According to Wikipedia, 2008
  2. Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia 2010
Źródło: „http://emet.hekko24.pl/lp/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=4613”